Skip to content
Dark MatterDark Matter
EnergyCase studies

Patient Energy Zero — Pampa JV (Vaca Muerta)

End-to-end reference implementation: a 200 MW associated-gas slot in Vaca Muerta, walked from land-secured through tenant-signed, with decomposition, settlement math, and a 4(a)(7) sublease.

The asset

The Pampa Energía JV is the reference asset for DMTR Energy — the most advanced compute-ready energy project on the platform at roughly 15% overall development. Land is secured, gas is committed, an MoU is signed, environmental and gas-extraction permits are in process, and turbine slots are committed for 2028 delivery.

The project: associated gas from Vaca Muerta (oil-window, NGL-rich; otherwise flared), behind-the-meter (no grid queue), 200 MW phase 1 targeting H1 2027 with a 5+ GW ceiling, RIGI-locked, hyperscaler anchor tenant. The integration test is at packages/energy/__tests__/integration/patient-energy-zero.test.ts.

Fixtures

The slot, demand spec, and capacity contract fixtures are in packages/fixtures/energy/:

FixturePurpose
sample-compute-slot.jsonPampa JV Phase 1 — 200 MW, gas_associated, behind-the-meter, RIGI-locked, 5 permits filed
sample-demand-spec.jsonHyperscaler 800–1200 MW LatAm batch-inference RFP, requires_decomposition, RIGI-eligible-only
sample-capacity-contract.jsonTolling structure — buyer dispatches, 5-yr term, $5M/mo capacity payment, $4.50/MWh variable, 92% availability threshold, $200MM RA pledge
sample-stage-gate-history.jsonLive development state — LAND ✓, ENERGY ✓, PERMITS in-progress, TURBINES informal-committed

Walkthrough

The integration test exercises every schema primitive end-to-end. Each step below corresponds to a passing assertion in the test file.

1. Schema validation

The Pampa JV fixture round-trips through ComputeSlot.parse() — every required field is present, every enum is valid, every nested object validates.

2. Position decoration

A Position is created with vertical_decoration: { vertical: "energy_compute", ref_id: "slot-pampa-jv-phase1" }. This optional field on Position is the only addition to @dmtr/core for the entire energy vertical.

3. Stage-gate prerequisites

Advancing to finance while permits is still in-progress fails: prerequisites [permits] are incomplete. After completing permits, substation, and turbines, the advance to finance clears.

4. Demand matching

An 800 MW DemandSpec with requires_decomposition: true and preferred_decomposition_block_mw: 100 surfaces Pampa Phase 1 as a partial-fit candidate offering 200 MW.

5. Rights-engine evaluation

The Verdict includes results for interconnect_priority, permit_stack, water_draw, bis_export_controls, rigi_eligibility, indigenous_consultation, data_residency, and ofac_tenant. With all permits issued and an OFAC-clean tenant, the Verdict is allowed: true.

The consent chain on the Position is sequenced: ENRE → CAMMESA → Pampa Energía (managing member) → Unblock (deal originator) → tenant compliance. The existing Consent shape from @dmtr/core handles the routing.

7. Tolling contract execution

Buyer-dispatched, 200 MW, 7800 BTU/kWh heat rate, $5M/month capacity payment, 92% availability threshold, gas transportation cure period of 10 days with failure_treats_unit_unavailable: true.

8. Settlement math

At 195 MW average availability against a 200 MW contract (97.5%, above the 92% threshold), the capacity payment adjusts to ~$4.875M. Tolling variable payment for 140,000 MWh at $4.50/MWh yields $630,000.

9. Decomposition

The 200 MW slot splits into four 50 MW child slots, each referencing the parent via parent_slot_id. Total child capacity equals parent capacity.

10. Secondary transfer

A SubleaseRequest with exemption_pathway: "section_4a7" reuses the core check4a7Resale machinery. Landlord consent is required; grid operator notice is not (behind-the-meter).

11. Force majeure

A 14-day wildfire claim extends the contract's delivery_period_end from 2032-05-31 to 2032-06-14. Cumulative force-majeure days are tracked against the 365-day termination threshold.

What this demonstrates

ClaimEvidence
Physical infrastructure modeled with the same rigor as financial positionsSame Position, Verdict, Consent, and Encumbrance primitives
Stranded energy assets are transferable, decomposable, and encumberabledecompose API, SubleaseRequest, ResourceAdequacyPledge as Encumbrance
The 4(a)(7) secondary-transfer playbook applies to compute slot subleasesSame check4a7Resale from core, same exemption pathway, same audit trail
Argentina is a viable first jurisdictionRIGI certificate recognized; ENRE/CAMMESA/ENARGAS modeled; five-party consent chain validated
Hyperscaler procurement can be programmaticDemandSpec + matchDemand + ranked Verdicts

Not yet covered

  • Canton/DAML settlement — the Goldstream node is live; energy bookkeeping integration is a follow-on.
  • MCP procurement tools — API endpoints exist; MCP wiring is a separate sprint.
  • Argentina entity formation — jurisdiction-specific; requires local counsel review.
  • Slot futures — modelable as Positions settling against the energize gate; the derivative product is downstream.

Running the test locally

pnpm install
pnpm --filter @dmtr/energy test

The fixtures are designed to be modified freely. Change the basin, carbon class, tenant, or contract structure — safeParse will surface the first constraint that breaks.

Edit this page on GitHub

Last reviewed: May 5, 2026

Was this page helpful?